The Wall
Street Journal
IN THE LEAD
By Carol Hymowitz
Middle
Managers
Are Unsung Heroes
On Corporate Stage
September 19, 2005; Page B1
Middle managers have gotten a bum rap in recent years. They've been dismissed as the boring foot soldiers of
business and taken for granted, while chief executives have gained fame and
fortune.
These days, many middle managers are handling more work with
leaner staffs -- but they aren't necessarily getting paid more. CEOs in office at least two years received a median salary
and bonus increase of 14.5% in 2004, while salary raises for middle managers on
average were stuck below 4% and are about the same this year, according to
compensation consultants.
At many companies, the revolving door in the corner office has
exposed performance failures. Dozens of CEOs have been
ousted in the past 12 months either because they couldn't
improve the bottom line and retain talent or because they were accused
of malfeasance.
In many of those cases, the middle managers are the ones who
stepped forward to show their superior leadership qualities. They
steadfastly got products and services to customers, and became their companies'
standard bearers for good ethics.
Middle managers at PeopleSoft kept the company running while
their CEO bitterly fought Oracle's hostile bid for 18 months.
The $10.6 billion acquisition was completed in January.
Some PeopleSoft staff jumped to other companies then, but those who
stayed with Oracle stayed productive. When Oracle
reported higher-than-expected fiscal fourth quarter earnings this June, it
rebutted concerns about employee turmoil after the takeover.
At Office Depot, managers didn't let the lack of a permanent CEO
for five months slow their efforts. They quickly
adjusted to reporting to Neil Austrian, a director who served as interim CEO
until the board named Steve Odland permanent CEO in
March.
The heavy lifting done by middle managers during the response to
Hurricane Katrina, solidified their new status. At
scores of companies, they crafted complex post-storm strategies, mobilized
employees and successfully executed plans. In the
process, they've shown how employees who are wanted and trusted to be useful
perform amazing feats.
Jeff McCracken, a chief engineer at
Before the storm hit, Mr. McCracken, based in
He conferred with dozens of engineers from
He gathered 365 engineers, machine operators and other workers,
who slept in campers and worked in shifts around the clock.
Last Monday, the workers lined up eight huge cranes,
and over the course of many hours, lifted the five miles of track in one piece
and then bolted it back on the bridge.
Everyone cheered when a train crossed the reset tracks early the
next morning. "It was a colossal job that took
more than 400 moves with heavy equipment," says Mr. McCracken. But what pleased him most was "working with people
from all parts of the company -- and getting the job done without anyone
getting hurt."
CEOs who feel under particular pressure from investors these
days need to relinquish their imperious status or they'll end up having power
taken away from them. By allowing more participation
from managers, they stand a better chance of avoiding the fate of chiefs like
former Morgan Stanley Chairman and CEO Philip Purcell, who resigned in June
after dissident executives quit and called for his ouster.
Corporate chiefs who want accurate information about how their
companies are and are not succeeding should speak frankly with middle managers
who deal daily with employees, suppliers and customers.
Jeffrey Rodek, chairman and former CEO
of Hyperion Solutions, got to know managers two and three levels below his
direct reports when he was named to head the company in 1999.
He would show up unannounced and without an entourage at tech and sales
managers' offices and ask them what they thought he should know.
CEOs who don't want upheaval among their rank and file should
take note of one big change in the job market. Ambitious
and talented middle managers have more opportunities to land new positions now
than they've had in the past five years. Retaining
them may require giving up some big corner-office compensation increases to
improve their salaries.
Chief executives also need to offer the same autonomy to make
decisions that enabled